FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C74500 vs C75400

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C74500 and C75400 are both copper alloy grades. C75400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 425 MPa (61.6 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for C74500, about 6% more. C74500 is harder — 150 HB against 140 HB for C75400 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C75400 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 180°C continuous) and C74500 conducts heat better (45 W/m·K vs 37 W/m·K).

C74500Choose it when surface hardness matters.

C75400Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C74500 vs C75400: properties

C74500C75400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

127 GPa18.4 Msi
125 GPa18.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

48 GPa7 Msi
47 GPa6.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

128 GPa18.6 Msi
122 GPa17.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

510 MPa74 ksi
515 MPa74.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

400 MPa58 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
140 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
75 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

158 HV
150 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 12% · Shear Strength 330 MPa47.9 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.73 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.72 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

954°C1,749 °F
1,021°C1,870 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,021°C1,870 °F
1,054°C1,929 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
37 W/m·K21.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

195 J/g83.8 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9 % IACS
6.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.92×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.56 µΩ·in
2.65×10⁻⁷ Ω·m10.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.26 V
-0.27 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
66 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5.2 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

58 kN·m/kg
59 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.5 MN·m/kg
14.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

630 kJ/m³
723 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.7 mm²/s
11.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

11
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC74500C75400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC74500C75400
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C74500 vs C75400 — frequently asked

Is C75400 stronger than C74500?

Yes. C75400 has a typical yield strength of 425 MPa (61.6 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for C74500 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 515 MPa (74.7 ksi) vs 510 MPa (74 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C74500 or C75400?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C74500 or C75400?

C75400. Its weldability rates fair (45/100) against fair (40/100) for C74500.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C74500 and C75400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.