FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C72150 vs C74500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C72150 and C74500 are both copper alloy grades. C74500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 200 MPa (29 ksi) for C72150, about 100% more; tensile strength follows at 510 MPa (74 ksi) vs 460 MPa (66.7 ksi). In exchange, C72150 is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 12% for C74500, and C74500 is harder (150 HB vs 90 HB). C72150 is stiffer (162 GPa vs 127 GPa) and C72150 runs hotter in service (500°C vs 180°C continuous). On the shop floor, C72150 welds better (good vs fair).

C72150Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C74500Choose it when strength drives the design.

C72150 vs C74500: properties

C72150C74500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

162 GPa23.5 Msi
127 GPa18.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

61 GPa8.8 Msi
48 GPa7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

158 GPa22.9 Msi
128 GPa18.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

460 MPa66.7 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

200 MPa29 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

38%
12%

Reduction in Area

55%
—

Shear Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

90 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

58 HRB
80 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

95 HV
158 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.73 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,280°C2,336 °F
954°C1,749 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,300°C2,372 °F
1,021°C1,870 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

21 W/m·K12.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

410 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

14.9 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
195 J/g83.8 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

500°C932 °F
180°C356 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.5 % IACS
9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m19.3 µΩ·in
1.92×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.56 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.18 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
90 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

8 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

52 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

18.2 MN·m/kg
14.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

123 kJ/m³
630 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.8 mm²/s
13.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC74500C72150

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC72150C74500
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C72150 vs C74500 — frequently asked

Is C74500 stronger than C72150?

Yes. C74500 has a typical yield strength of 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 200 MPa (29 ksi) for C72150 — about 100% more. Tensile strength is 510 MPa (74 ksi) vs 460 MPa (66.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C72150 or C74500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C72150 or C74500?

C74500, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for C72150; for welding the order is C72150 first (good, 60/100) then C74500 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C72150 and C74500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.