FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C71900 vs C74500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C71900 and C74500 are both copper alloy grades. C71900 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for C74500, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 510 MPa (74 ksi). C71900 is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 12% for C74500, and C71900 is harder (230 HB vs 150 HB). C71900 is stiffer (152 GPa vs 127 GPa) and C71900 runs hotter in service (320°C vs 180°C continuous). On the shop floor, C71900 welds better (good vs fair).

C71900Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C71900 vs C74500: properties

C71900C74500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
127 GPa18.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

57 GPa8.3 Msi
48 GPa7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

150 GPa21.8 Msi
128 GPa18.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
12%

Reduction in Area

35%
—

Shear Strength

470 MPa68.2 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

230 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

24 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

250 HV
158 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
80 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.73 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,200°C2,192 °F
954°C1,749 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,240°C2,264 °F
1,021°C1,870 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

32 W/m·K18.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
195 J/g83.8 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

320°C608 °F
180°C356 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

5.5 % IACS
9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.13×10⁻⁷ Ω·m12.3 µΩ·in
1.92×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.56 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
90 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

85 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17 MN·m/kg
14.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

995 kJ/m³
630 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.5 mm²/s
13.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC74500C71900

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC71900C74500
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C71900 vs C74500 — frequently asked

Is C71900 stronger than C74500?

Yes. C71900 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for C74500 — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 510 MPa (74 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C71900 or C74500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C71900 or C74500?

C71900. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against fair (40/100) for C74500.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C71900 and C74500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.