FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C71520 vs C74500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C71520 and C74500 are both copper alloy grades. C74500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for C71520, about 186% more; tensile strength follows at 510 MPa (74 ksi) vs 380 MPa (55.1 ksi). In exchange, C71520 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 12% for C74500, and C74500 is harder (150 HB vs 85 HB). C71520 is stiffer (152 GPa vs 127 GPa) and C71520 runs hotter in service (350°C vs 180°C continuous). On the shop floor, C71520 welds better (excellent vs fair).

C71520Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C74500Choose it when strength drives the design.

C71520 vs C74500: properties

C71520C74500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
127 GPa18.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

57 GPa8.3 Msi
48 GPa7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

158 GPa22.9 Msi
128 GPa18.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

140 MPa20.3 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
12%

Reduction in Area

60%
—

Shear Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

140 MPa20.3 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

42 HRB
80 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

95 HV
158 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.73 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,171°C2,140 °F
954°C1,749 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,238°C2,260 °F
1,021°C1,870 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

29 W/m·K16.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

215 J/g92.4 BTU/lb
195 J/g83.8 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

350°C662 °F
180°C356 °F

Min Service Temperature

-198°C-324 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

4.6 % IACS
9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.75×10⁻⁷ Ω·m14.8 µΩ·in
1.92×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.56 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

50 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
90 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.6 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

35%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Water 260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

43 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17 MN·m/kg
14.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
630 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

8.6 mm²/s
13.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC74500C71520

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC71520C74500
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C71520 vs C74500 — frequently asked

Is C74500 stronger than C71520?

Yes. C74500 has a typical yield strength of 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for C71520 — about 186% more. Tensile strength is 510 MPa (74 ksi) vs 380 MPa (55.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C71520 or C74500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C71520 or C74500?

C74500, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for C71520; for welding the order is C71520 first (excellent, 90/100) then C74500 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C71520 and C74500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.