FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C52100 vs C65400

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C52100 and C65400 are both copper alloy grades. C65400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) for C52100, about 6% more. In exchange, C52100 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 5% for C65400, and C65400 is harder (190 HB vs 170 HB). C65400 is lighter (8.53 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C52100) and C65400 is stiffer (117 GPa vs 110 GPa). On the shop floor, C65400 welds better (very good vs fair) and C65400 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C52100 (specialty, $$$$$).

C52100Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C65400Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C52100 vs C65400: properties

C52100C65400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
117 GPa17 Msi

Shear Modulus

41 GPa5.9 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
118 GPa17.1 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
5%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

170 HB
190 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

87 HRB
93 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

190 HV
200 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 660 MPa95.7 ksi · Shear Strength 400 MPa58 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.53 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

854°C1,569 °F
971°C1,780 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,000°C1,832 °F
1,027°C1,881 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

62 W/m·K35.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
175°C347 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 18.4 µm/m·K10.2 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

13 % IACS
6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.33×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.24 µΩ·in
2.87×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
76 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
33 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
30%

Weldability

40 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

—
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

75 kN·m/kg
77 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.5 MN·m/kg
13.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,556 kJ/m³
1,643 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

18.7 mm²/s
11.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

20
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC52100C65400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC52100C65400
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C52100 vs C65400 — frequently asked

Is C65400 stronger than C52100?

Yes. C65400 has a typical yield strength of 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) for C52100 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) vs 660 MPa (95.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C52100 or C65400?

C65400 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C52100 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, C52100 or C65400?

C65400. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against fair (40/100) for C52100.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C52100 and C65400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.