FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C52100 vs C62581

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C52100 and C62581 are both copper alloy grades. C52100 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 483 MPa (70.1 ksi) for C62581, about 21% more. C52100 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 3% for C62581, and C62581 is harder (262 HB vs 170 HB). C62581 is lighter (7.3 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C52100) and C62581 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C52100 welds better (fair vs poor) and C62581 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C52100 (specialty, $$$$$).

C52100Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C62581Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

C52100 vs C62581: properties

C52100C62581

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

41 GPa5.9 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

660 MPa95.7 ksi
793 MPa115 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
483 MPa70.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
3%

Shear Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

170 HB
262 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

87 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

190 HV
275 HV

Reduction in Area

—
6%

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
7 J5.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
26 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.3 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

854°C1,569 °F
1,015°C1,859 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,000°C1,832 °F
1,045°C1,913 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

62 W/m·K35.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.4 µm/m·K10.2 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

13 % IACS
7.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.33×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.24 µΩ·in
2.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.06 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.31 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

40 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
10 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

75 kN·m/kg
109 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.5 MN·m/kg
15.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,556 kJ/m³
1,014 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

18.7 mm²/s
13.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

20
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC52100C62581

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC52100C62581
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C52100 vs C62581 — frequently asked

Is C52100 stronger than C62581?

Yes. C52100 has a typical yield strength of 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 483 MPa (70.1 ksi) for C62581 — about 21% more. Tensile strength is 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) vs 793 MPa (115 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C52100 or C62581?

C62581 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C52100 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, C52100 or C62581?

C52100. Its weldability rates fair (40/100) against poor (25/100) for C62581.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C52100 and C62581 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.