FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C51900 vs C65400

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C51900 and C65400 are both copper alloy grades. C65400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for C51900, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). In exchange, C51900 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 5% for C65400, and C65400 is harder (190 HB vs 155 HB). C65400 is lighter (8.53 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C51900) and C51900 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 175°C continuous). On the shop floor, C65400 welds better (very good vs fair) and C65400 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C51900 (specialty, $$$$$).

C51900Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C65400Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C51900 vs C65400: properties

C51900C65400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
117 GPa17 Msi

Shear Modulus

43 GPa6.2 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
118 GPa17.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
660 MPa95.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
5%

Reduction in Area

35%
—

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
—

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

155 HB
190 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

78 HRB
93 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

165 HV
200 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.53 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

910°C1,670 °F
971°C1,780 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,040°C1,904 °F
1,027°C1,881 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

67 W/m·K38.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
18.4 µm/m·K10.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
175°C347 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
2.87×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
76 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
33 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
30%

Weldability

45 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Castability

—
40 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Water 320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
77 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
13.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

880 kJ/m³
1,643 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

20.2 mm²/s
11.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC51900C65400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC51900C65400
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C51900 vs C65400 — frequently asked

Is C65400 stronger than C51900?

Yes. C65400 has a typical yield strength of 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for C51900 — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C51900 or C65400?

C65400 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C51900 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C51900 or C65400?

C65400, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 33/100 against 25/100 for C51900; for welding the order is C65400 first (very good, 80/100) then C51900 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C51900 and C65400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.