FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C51900 vs C64800

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C51900 and C64800 are both copper alloy grades. C64800 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 590 MPa (85.6 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for C51900, about 31% more; tensile strength follows at 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). In exchange, C51900 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 10% for C64800, and C64800 is harder (210 HV vs 165 HV). C64800 is stiffer (130 GPa vs 115 GPa) and C64800 conducts heat better (175 W/m·K vs 67 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C64800 machines more easily (fair vs poor), C64800 welds better (good vs fair), and C64800 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C51900 (specialty, $$$$$).

C51900Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C64800Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

C51900 vs C64800: properties

C51900C64800

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
130 GPa18.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

43 GPa6.2 Msi
48 GPa7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
590 MPa85.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
10%

Reduction in Area

35%
—

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
—

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

155 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

78 HRB
93 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

165 HV
210 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 120 GPa17.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

910°C1,670 °F
1,030°C1,886 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,040°C1,904 °F
1,075°C1,967 °F

Same in both: Density 8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

67 W/m·K38.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
175 W/m·K101 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
45 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
3.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.25 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
30%

Weldability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
78 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
14.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

880 kJ/m³
1,339 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

20.2 mm²/s
52.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
53

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC51900C64800

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC51900C64800
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C51900 vs C64800 — frequently asked

Is C64800 stronger than C51900?

Yes. C64800 has a typical yield strength of 590 MPa (85.6 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for C51900 — about 31% more. Tensile strength is 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C51900 or C64800?

C64800 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C51900 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C51900 or C64800?

C64800. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (25/100) for C51900; for welding the order is C64800 first (good, 60/100) then C51900 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C51900 and C64800 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.