FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C51900 vs C63800

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C51900 and C63800 are both copper alloy grades. C63800 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 855 MPa (124 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for C51900, about 90% more; tensile strength follows at 895 MPa (130 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). In exchange, C51900 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 4% for C63800, and C63800 is harder (255 HB vs 155 HB). C63800 is lighter (7.69 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C51900) and C63800 is stiffer (124 GPa vs 115 GPa). On the shop floor, C63800 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C51900 (specialty, $$$$$).

C51900Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C63800Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C51900 vs C63800: properties

C51900C63800

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
124 GPa18 Msi

Shear Modulus

43 GPa6.2 Msi
47 GPa6.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
895 MPa130 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
855 MPa124 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
4%

Reduction in Area

35%
—

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
—

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

155 HB
255 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

78 HRB
99 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

165 HV
270 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
25 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.69 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

910°C1,670 °F
1,030°C1,886 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,040°C1,904 °F
1,060°C1,940 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

67 W/m·K38.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
44.6 W/m·K25.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
376 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
16.9 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb
—

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
1.72×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.77 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
74 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
32 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
30%

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 45 / 100 · Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
116 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
16.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

880 kJ/m³
2,948 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

20.2 mm²/s
15.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
19

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC51900C63800

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC51900C63800
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C51900 vs C63800 — frequently asked

Is C63800 stronger than C51900?

Yes. C63800 has a typical yield strength of 855 MPa (124 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for C51900 — about 90% more. Tensile strength is 895 MPa (130 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C51900 or C63800?

C63800 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C51900 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C51900 or C63800?

C63800, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 32/100 against 25/100 for C51900.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C51900 and C63800 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.