FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C51900 vs C63020

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C51900 and C63020 are both copper alloy grades. C63020 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 725 MPa (105 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for C51900, about 61% more; tensile strength follows at 965 MPa (140 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). In exchange, C51900 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 13% for C63020, and C63020 is harder (285 HB vs 155 HB). C63020 is lighter (7.58 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C51900) and C63020 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C63020 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C51900 (specialty, $$$$$).

C51900Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C63020Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C51900 vs C63020: properties

C51900C63020

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
117 GPa17 Msi

Shear Modulus

43 GPa6.2 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
965 MPa140 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
725 MPa105 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
13%

Reduction in Area

35%
18%

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

155 HB
285 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

78 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

165 HV
300 HV

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
29 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.58 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

910°C1,670 °F
1,027°C1,881 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,040°C1,904 °F
1,054°C1,929 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

67 W/m·K38.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb
220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
2.46×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.27 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
28 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Weldability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
127 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
15.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

880 kJ/m³
2,246 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

20.2 mm²/s
12.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC51900C63020

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC51900C63020
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C51900 vs C63020 — frequently asked

Is C63020 stronger than C51900?

Yes. C63020 has a typical yield strength of 725 MPa (105 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for C51900 — about 61% more. Tensile strength is 965 MPa (140 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C51900 or C63020?

C63020 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C51900 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose C51900 over C63020?

Pick C51900 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded. Pick C63020 when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C51900 and C63020 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.