FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C51900 vs C62581

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C51900 and C62581 are both copper alloy grades. C62581 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 483 MPa (70.1 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for C51900, about 7% more; tensile strength follows at 793 MPa (115 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). In exchange, C51900 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 3% for C62581, and C62581 is harder (262 HB vs 155 HB). C62581 is lighter (7.3 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C51900) and C62581 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C51900 welds better (fair vs poor) and C62581 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C51900 (specialty, $$$$$).

C51900Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C62581Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C51900 vs C62581: properties

C51900C62581

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

43 GPa6.2 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
793 MPa115 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
483 MPa70.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
3%

Reduction in Area

35%
6%

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
—

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

155 HB
262 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

78 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

165 HV
275 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
7 J5.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
26 HRC

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 115 GPa16.7 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.3 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

910°C1,670 °F
1,015°C1,859 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,040°C1,904 °F
1,045°C1,913 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

67 W/m·K38.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
7.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
2.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.06 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.31 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
10 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
109 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
15.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

880 kJ/m³
1,014 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

20.2 mm²/s
13.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC51900C62581

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC51900C62581
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C51900 vs C62581 — frequently asked

Is C62581 stronger than C51900?

Yes. C62581 has a typical yield strength of 483 MPa (70.1 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for C51900 — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 793 MPa (115 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C51900 or C62581?

C62581 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C51900 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C51900 or C62581?

C62581, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for C51900; for welding the order is C51900 first (fair, 45/100) then C62581 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C51900 and C62581 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.