FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C51900 vs C62500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C51900 and C62500 are both copper alloy grades. C51900 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) for C62500, about 8% more. C51900 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 2% for C62500, and C62500 is harder (240 HB vs 155 HB). C62500 is lighter (7.16 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C51900) and C62500 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C51900 welds better (fair vs poor) and C62500 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C51900 (specialty, $$$$$).

C51900Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C62500Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

C51900 vs C62500: properties

C51900C62500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
114 GPa16.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
2%

Reduction in Area

35%
4%

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

155 HB
240 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

78 HRB
99 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

165 HV
250 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
22 HRC

Same in both: Shear Modulus 43 GPa6.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.16 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

910°C1,670 °F
1,035°C1,895 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,040°C1,904 °F
1,050°C1,922 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

67 W/m·K38.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
41.9 W/m·K24.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
375 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
2.16×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.27 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
22 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
10 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

—
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
106 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
15.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

880 kJ/m³
755 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

20.2 mm²/s
15.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC51900C62500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC51900C62500
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C51900 vs C62500 — frequently asked

Is C51900 stronger than C62500?

Yes. C51900 has a typical yield strength of 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) for C62500 — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) vs 760 MPa (110 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C51900 or C62500?

C62500 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C51900 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, C51900 or C62500?

C51900. Its weldability rates fair (45/100) against poor (25/100) for C62500.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C51900 and C62500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.