FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C51900 vs C53400

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C51900 and C53400 are both copper alloy grades. C51900 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) against 490 MPa (71.1 ksi) for C53400, about 6% more. C51900 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 6% for C53400, and C53400 is harder (87 HRB vs 78 HRB). C51900 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous) and C53400 conducts heat better (84 W/m·K vs 67 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C53400 machines more easily (very good vs poor), C51900 welds better (fair vs poor), and C53400 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C51900 (specialty, $$$$$).

C51900Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C53400Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when cost is the deciding factor.

C51900 vs C53400: properties

C51900C53400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

43 GPa6.2 Msi
41 GPa5.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
490 MPa71.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
6%

Reduction in Area

35%
—

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
—

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

155 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

78 HRB
87 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

165 HV
160 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 450 MPa65.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.89 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

910°C1,670 °F
955°C1,751 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,040°C1,904 °F
1,050°C1,922 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

67 W/m·K38.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
84 W/m·K48.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
17.8 µm/m·K9.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb
200 J/g86 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
18 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
9.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.78 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.31 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
66 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
78 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
80%

Weldability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
55 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
12.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

880 kJ/m³
920 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

20.2 mm²/s
24.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC51900C53400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC51900C53400
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C51900 vs C53400 — frequently asked

Is C51900 stronger than C53400?

Yes. C51900 has a typical tensile strength of 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) against 490 MPa (71.1 ksi) for C53400 — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, C51900 or C53400?

C53400 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C51900 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C51900 or C53400?

C53400. Its machinability rates very good (78/100) against poor (25/100) for C51900; for welding the order is C51900 first (fair, 45/100) then C53400 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C51900 and C53400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.