FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C18100-O61 vs C18100-TD04

Copper Alloy · C18100 temper comparison

C18100-O61 and C18100-TD04 are two conditions of the same copper alloy grade, C18100: O61 (annealed) versus TD04 (solution heat treated and cold worked, full hard). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. C18100-TD04 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for C18100-O61, about 3.6 times as much; tensile strength follows at 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi). In exchange, C18100-O61 is the more ductile: elongation 42% versus 14% for C18100-TD04, and C18100-TD04 is harder (120 HB vs 58 HB). C18100-O61 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 200°C continuous) and C18100-O61 conducts heat better (345 W/m·K vs 185 W/m·K).

C18100-O61Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C18100-TD04Choose it when strength drives the design.

C18100-O61 vs C18100-TD04: properties

C18100-O61C18100-TD04

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

125 GPa18.1 Msi
128 GPa18.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

42%
14%

Reduction in Area

72%
50%

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

95 J70.1 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

58 HB
120 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

28 HRB
70 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

62 HV
128 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 48 GPa7 Msi · Bulk Modulus 140 GPa20.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 8.89 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,070°C1,958 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,080°C1,976 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

345 W/m·K199 BTU/hr·ft·°F
185 W/m·K107 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

88 % IACS
45 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.96×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.772 µΩ·in
3.83×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.51 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.2 V · Corrosion Resistance 48 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

24 / 100
32 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

18%
22%

Weldability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Castability 45 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.8 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC18100

C18100-O61 vs C18100-TD04 — frequently asked

Is C18100-TD04 stronger than C18100-O61?

Yes. C18100-TD04 has a typical yield strength of 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for C18100-O61 — about 3.6 times as much. Tensile strength is 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, O61 or TD04?

TH04 is the default C18100 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither O61 nor TD04). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, C18100-O61 or C18100-TD04?

C18100-TD04, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 32/100 against 24/100 for C18100-O61; for welding the order is C18100-O61 first (fair, 50/100) then C18100-TD04 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C18100-O61 and C18100-TD04 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.