FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C17510 vs QBe0.4

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C17510 and QBe0.4 are both copper alloy grades. QBe0.4 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 655 MPa (95 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for C17510, about 3.9 times as much; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, C17510 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 12% for QBe0.4, and QBe0.4 is harder (200 HB vs 70 HB). QBe0.4 is stiffer (138 GPa vs 131 GPa) and QBe0.4 conducts heat better (208 W/m·K vs 105 W/m·K). On the shop floor, QBe0.4 machines more easily (fair vs poor), C17510 welds better (good vs fair), and QBe0.4 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C17510 (specialty, $$$$$).

C17510Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

QBe0.4Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

C17510 vs QBe0.4: properties

C17510QBe0.4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

131 GPa19 Msi
138 GPa20 Msi

Shear Modulus

53 GPa7.7 Msi
52 GPa7.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
655 MPa95 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
12%

Reduction in Area

60%
—

Shear Strength

210 MPa30.5 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

95 MPa·√m86.5 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

35 HRB
95 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

75 HV
215 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 115 GPa16.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.75 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.83 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,000°C1,832 °F
1,030°C1,886 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,070°C1,958 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

105 W/m·K60.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
208 W/m·K120 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

418 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F
17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

22 % IACS
50 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.07 µΩ·in
3.45×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.36 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.2 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

18%
30%

Weldability

58 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
50 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

65 MJ/kg27,945 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
86 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15 MN·m/kg
15.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

110 kJ/m³
1,554 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

28.7 mm²/s
56.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
65

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC17510QBe0.4

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC17510QBe0.4
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionA—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C17510 vs QBe0.4 — frequently asked

Is QBe0.4 stronger than C17510?

Yes. QBe0.4 has a typical yield strength of 655 MPa (95 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for C17510 — about 3.9 times as much. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C17510 or QBe0.4?

QBe0.4 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C17510 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C17510 or QBe0.4?

QBe0.4. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (25/100) for C17510; for welding the order is C17510 first (good, 58/100) then QBe0.4 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C17510 and QBe0.4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.