FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C17465-TD02 vs C17465-TF00

Copper Alloy · C17465 temper comparison

C17465-TD02 and C17465-TF00 are two conditions of the same copper alloy grade, C17465: TD02 (solution heat treated and cold worked, half hard) versus TF00 (solution heat treated and precipitation hardened). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. C17465-TF00 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) for C17465-TD02, about 49% more; tensile strength follows at 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi). C17465-TF00 is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 12% for C17465-TD02, and C17465-TF00 is harder (195 HB vs 130 HB). C17465-TF00 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 200°C continuous) and C17465-TF00 conducts heat better (215 W/m·K vs 135 W/m·K).

C17465-TF00Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C17465-TD02 vs C17465-TF00: properties

C17465-TD02C17465-TF00

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

132 GPa19.1 Msi
138 GPa20 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

370 MPa53.7 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
15%

Reduction in Area

35%
40%

Compressive Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Shear Strength

305 MPa44.2 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

38 J28 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

130 HB
195 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

72 HRB
95 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

140 HV
205 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 53 GPa7.7 Msi · Bulk Modulus 115 GPa16.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Hardness, Rockwell C 22 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 8.83 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,000°C1,832 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,070°C1,958 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

135 W/m·K78 BTU/hr·ft·°F
215 W/m·K124 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

30 % IACS
50 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.75×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.26 µΩ·in
3.45×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.36 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.2 V · Corrosion Resistance 65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
55%

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 25 / 100 · Castability 45 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 6.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC17465

C17465-TD02 vs C17465-TF00 — frequently asked

Is C17465-TF00 stronger than C17465-TD02?

Yes. C17465-TF00 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) for C17465-TD02 — about 49% more. Tensile strength is 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, TD02 or TF00?

TF00 is the default C17465 condition in the FabDigit quote flow. The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, C17465-TD02 or C17465-TF00?

C17465-TF00, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 58/100 for C17465-TD02.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C17465-TD02 and C17465-TF00 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.