FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C17450 vs CuCrZr

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C17450 and CuCrZr are both copper alloy grades. C17450 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 600 MPa (87 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for CuCrZr, about 71% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 430 MPa (62.4 ksi). In exchange, CuCrZr is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 12% for C17450, and C17450 is harder (200 HB vs 130 HB). C17450 is stiffer (138 GPa vs 125 GPa) and CuCrZr runs hotter in service (450°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, CuCrZr machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100) and CuCrZr sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than C17450 (high, $$$$).

C17450Choose it when strength drives the design.

CuCrZrChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C17450 vs CuCrZr: properties

C17450CuCrZr

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

138 GPa20 Msi
125 GPa18.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

53 GPa7.7 Msi
47 GPa6.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
137 GPa19.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

600 MPa87 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
22%

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
130 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

93 HRB
75 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
140 HV

Reduction in Area

—
40%

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.89 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,030°C1,886 °F
1,070°C1,958 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,070°C1,958 °F
1,085°C1,985 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

210 W/m·K121 BTU/hr·ft·°F
320 W/m·K185 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F
17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
450°C842 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

50 % IACS
85 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.45×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.36 µΩ·in
2.03×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.799 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.2 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
42 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
30%

Weldability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

78 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

80 kN·m/kg
48 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.7 MN·m/kg
14.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,304 kJ/m³
490 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

56.8 mm²/s
93.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

61
65

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCuCrZrC17450

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC17450CuCrZr
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Aged
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C17450 vs CuCrZr — frequently asked

Is C17450 stronger than CuCrZr?

Yes. C17450 has a typical yield strength of 600 MPa (87 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for CuCrZr — about 71% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 430 MPa (62.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C17450 or CuCrZr?

CuCrZr is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while C17450 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C17450 or CuCrZr?

CuCrZr, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for C17450; for welding the order is C17450 first (good, 55/100) then CuCrZr (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C17450 and CuCrZr side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.