FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C12200 vs C19210

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C12200 and C19210 are both copper alloy grades. C19210 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 345 MPa (50 ksi) against 76 MPa (11 ksi) for C12200, about 4.5 times as much; tensile strength follows at 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) vs 235 MPa (34.1 ksi). In exchange, C12200 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 5% for C19210. On the shop floor, C12200 welds better (excellent vs fair).

C12200Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C19210Choose it when strength drives the design.

C12200 vs C19210: properties

C12200C19210

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

117 GPa17 Msi
121 GPa17.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
45 GPa6.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
138 GPa20 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
370 MPa53.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

76 MPa11 ksi
345 MPa50 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
5%

Reduction in Area

75%
—

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
135 MPa19.6 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

45 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
60 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
125 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.91 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,083°C1,981 °F
1,080°C1,976 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,083°C1,981 °F
1,084°C1,983 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

339 W/m·K196 BTU/hr·ft·°F
360 W/m·K208 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

85 % IACS
90 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.03×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.799 µΩ·in
1.92×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.756 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.22 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

85 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

98 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

100 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
42 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
13.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

25 kJ/m³
492 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

98.5 mm²/s
104.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

40
63

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC12200C19210

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC12200C19210
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C12200 vs C19210 — frequently asked

Is C19210 stronger than C12200?

Yes. C19210 has a typical yield strength of 345 MPa (50 ksi) against 76 MPa (11 ksi) for C12200 — about 4.5 times as much. Tensile strength is 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) vs 235 MPa (34.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C12200 or C19210?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C12200 or C19210?

C19210, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 20/100 for C12200; for welding the order is C12200 first (excellent, 85/100) then C19210 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C12200 and C19210 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.