FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C11000 vs C18000

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C11000 and C18000 are both copper alloy grades, both conductive cu alloy. C18000 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C11000, about 8.5 times as much; tensile strength follows at 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 221 MPa (32.1 ksi). In exchange, C11000 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 12% for C18000, and C18000 is harder (200 HB vs 45 HB). C18000 is stiffer (131 GPa vs 117 GPa) and C18000 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 250°C continuous). On the shop floor, C18000 machines more easily (fair vs poor).

C11000Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C18000Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C11000 vs C18000: properties

C11000C18000

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

117 GPa17 Msi
131 GPa19 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
49 GPa7.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
133 GPa19.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

221 MPa32.1 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

69 MPa10 ksi
585 MPa84.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
12%

Reduction in Area

75%
—

Shear Strength

152 MPa22 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

45 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Vickers

50 HV
210 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
95 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.78 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,065°C1,949 °F
1,030°C1,886 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,083°C1,981 °F
1,075°C1,967 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

391 W/m·K226 BTU/hr·ft·°F
200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
376 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

101 % IACS
48 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.71×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.673 µΩ·in
3.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.42 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.32 V
-0.25 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 60 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
—

Formability (cold)

98 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

92 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
56 MJ/kg24,076 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
79 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
14.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

20 kJ/m³
1,306 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

113.6 mm²/s
60.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

43
60

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC11000C18000

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC11000C18000
3D printingYes—
Default conditionOH
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 9 finishes: Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Gold Plating, Nickel Plating, Painting, Silver Plating, Tin Plating.

C11000 vs C18000 — frequently asked

Is C18000 stronger than C11000?

Yes. C18000 has a typical yield strength of 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C11000 — about 8.5 times as much. Tensile strength is 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 221 MPa (32.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C11000 or C18000?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C11000 or C18000?

C18000. Its machinability rates fair (50/100) against poor (25/100) for C11000.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C11000 and C18000 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.