FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C1020 vs C12200

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C1020 and C12200 are both copper alloy grades. C12200 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 76 MPa (11 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C1020, about 10% more; tensile strength follows at 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) vs 221 MPa (32.1 ksi). C12200 is harder — 45 HB against 40 HB for C1020 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C1020 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 200°C continuous) and C1020 conducts heat better (391 W/m·K vs 339 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C12200 welds better (excellent vs very good).

C1020Choose it when the part sees heat.

C12200Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

C1020 vs C12200: properties

C1020C12200

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
117 GPa17 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

221 MPa32.1 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

69 MPa10 ksi
76 MPa11 ksi

Shear Strength

152 MPa22 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

40 HB
45 HB

Hardness, Vickers

48 HV
—

Same in both: Shear Modulus 44 GPa6.4 Msi · Bulk Modulus 140 GPa20.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Elongation at Break 45% · Reduction in Area 75% · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 76 MPa11 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,083°C1,981 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,083°C1,981 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

391 W/m·K226 BTU/hr·ft·°F
339 W/m·K196 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

101 % IACS
85 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.71×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.673 µΩ·in
2.03×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.799 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.3 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Weldability

75 / 100
85 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

95 / 100
100 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Formability (cold) 98 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.8 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
26 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.9 MN·m/kg
13.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

21 kJ/m³
25 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

113.6 mm²/s
98.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

44
40

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC12200C1020

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC1020C12200
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—O
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C1020 vs C12200 — frequently asked

Is C12200 stronger than C1020?

Yes. C12200 has a typical yield strength of 76 MPa (11 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C1020 — about 10% more. Tensile strength is 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) vs 221 MPa (32.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C1020 or C12200?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C1020 or C12200?

C1020, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 20/100 for C12200; for welding the order is C12200 first (excellent, 85/100) then C1020 (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C1020 and C12200 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.