FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C10100 vs CuAg0.04P

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C10100 and CuAg0.04P are both copper alloy grades. CuAg0.04P is the stronger of the two: yield strength 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C10100, about 190% more; tensile strength follows at 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) vs 235 MPa (34.1 ksi). In exchange, C10100 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 18% for CuAg0.04P, and CuAg0.04P is harder (85 HB vs 45 HB). CuAg0.04P runs hotter in service (250°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, CuAg0.04P machines more easily (28 vs 18 out of 100), CuAg0.04P welds better (excellent vs very good), and CuAg0.04P sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C10100 (specialty, $$$$$).

C10100Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

CuAg0.04PChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C10100 vs CuAg0.04P: properties

C10100CuAg0.04P

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

117 GPa17 Msi
122 GPa17.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
45 GPa6.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

69 MPa10 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
18%

Reduction in Area

75%
65%

Shear Strength

152 MPa22 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

45 HB
85 HB

Hardness, Vickers

50 HV
90 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
48 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 140 GPa20.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.93 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,083°C1,981 °F
1,065°C1,949 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,083°C1,981 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

391 W/m·K226 BTU/hr·ft·°F
360 W/m·K208 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.7 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F
17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

101 % IACS
94 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.71×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.672 µΩ·in
1.83×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.72 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.24 V
-0.22 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
28 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

—
65 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Brazeability / Solderability 95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
30 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
13.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

20 kJ/m³
164 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

113.6 mm²/s
104.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

44
45

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC10100CuAg0.04P

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC10100CuAg0.04P
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C10100 vs CuAg0.04P — frequently asked

Is CuAg0.04P stronger than C10100?

Yes. CuAg0.04P has a typical yield strength of 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C10100 — about 190% more. Tensile strength is 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) vs 235 MPa (34.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C10100 or CuAg0.04P?

CuAg0.04P is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C10100 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C10100 or CuAg0.04P?

CuAg0.04P, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 28/100 against 18/100 for C10100; for welding the order is CuAg0.04P first (excellent, 85/100) then C10100 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C10100 and CuAg0.04P side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.