G-9 vs GPO-3
Composite · grade comparison
G-9 and GPO-3 are both composite grades. G-9 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for GPO-3, about 3.4 times as much. GPO-3 is lighter (1.85 g/cm³ vs 1.95 g/cm³ for G-9) and G-9 is stiffer (19 GPa vs 9 GPa). On the shop floor, GPO-3 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and GPO-3 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than G-9 (high, $$$$).
G-9Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.
GPO-3Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.
G-9 vs GPO-3: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all composite grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all composite grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Compressive Strength
Compressive Modulus
Flexural Strength
Flexural Modulus
Shear Strength
Izod Impact, Notched
Hardness, Rockwell M
Elongation at Break
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Water Absorption (24 h)
Water Absorption (Saturation)
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Max Service Temperature (short-term)
Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.32 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F · Limiting Oxygen Index 42%
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Dielectric Strength
Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)
Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)
Surface Resistivity
Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
UV / Weathering Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Same in both: Polishability 20 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Thermal Diffusivity
Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | G-9 | GPO-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$ Premium |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
G-9 vs GPO-3 — frequently asked
Is G-9 stronger than GPO-3?
Yes. G-9 has a typical tensile strength of 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for GPO-3 — about 3.4 times as much.
Which is cheaper, G-9 or GPO-3?
GPO-3 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while G-9 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which is easier to machine, G-9 or GPO-3?
GPO-3. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (30/100) for G-9.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in G-9 and GPO-3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.