FabDigitFabDigit

5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb vs Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10)

Composite · grade comparison

5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb and Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10) are both composite grades. Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10) is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 3 MPa (0.435 ksi) against 3 MPa (0.406 ksi) for 5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb, about 7% more. Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10) is lighter (0.05 g/cm³ vs 0.05 g/cm³ for 5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb) and 5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb is stiffer (0.52 GPa vs 0.17 GPa). On the shop floor, 5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10) (high, $$$$).

5052-H39 Aluminum HoneycombChoose it when cost is the deciding factor.

Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb vs Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10): properties

5052-H39 Aluminum HoneycombNomex Honeycomb (HRH-10)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.52 GPa0.08 Msi
0.17 GPa0.02 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.31 GPa0.04 Msi
0.05 GPa0.01 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

3 MPa0.41 ksi
3 MPa0.44 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1 MPa0.19 ksi
—

Compressive Strength

3 MPa0.37 ksi
4 MPa0.56 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.52 GPa0.08 Msi
0.17 GPa0.02 Msi

Shear Strength

1 MPa0.21 ksi
2 MPa0.25 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.05 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.05 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

—
275°C527 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

2.5 W/m·K1.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.06 W/m·K0.03 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

177°C351 °F
180°C356 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-55°C-67 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

250°C482 °F
200°C392 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

—
30%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

2.7×10⁻⁶ Ω·m106 µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

—
1.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.005

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

66 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

95 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb
250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

10%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 14 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

56 kN·m/kg
63 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.5 MN·m/kg
3.6 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

55.9 mm²/s
0.9 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability5052-H39 Aluminum HoneycombNomex Honeycomb (HRH-10)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb vs Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10) — frequently asked

Is Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10) stronger than 5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb?

Yes. Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10) has a typical tensile strength of 3 MPa (0.435 ksi) against 3 MPa (0.406 ksi) for 5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb — about 7% more.

Which is cheaper, 5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb or Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10)?

5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10) is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb or Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10)?

Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10), by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 38/100 for 5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5052-H39 Aluminum Honeycomb and Nomex Honeycomb (HRH-10) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.