FabDigitFabDigit

C4 vs YG3

Ceramic · grade comparison

C4 and YG3 are both ceramic grades. C4 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 1,200 MPa (174 ksi) against 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) for YG3, about 9% more. C4 is harder — 1,850 HV against 1,580 HV for YG3 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C4 conducts heat better (100 W/m·K vs 88 W/m·K).

C4Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

C4 vs YG3: properties

C4YG3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

665 GPa96.5 Msi
650 GPa94.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

275 GPa39.9 Msi
268 GPa38.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

382 GPa55.4 Msi
385 GPa55.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,200 MPa174 ksi
1,100 MPa160 ksi

Compressive Strength

6,500 MPa943 ksi
6,000 MPa870 ksi

Flexural Strength

1,600 MPa232 ksi
1,200 MPa174 ksi

Shear Strength

1,200 MPa174 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

8 MPa·√m7.3 ksi·√in
8.5 MPa·√m7.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

1,850 HV
1,580 HV

Hardness, Knoop

1,800 HK
1,500 HK

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.21 · Elongation at Break 0% · Hardness, Mohs 9

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

15.2 g/cm³0.55 lb/in³
15.1 g/cm³0.55 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,320°C2,408 °F · Porosity 0.02%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

100 W/m·K57.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
88 W/m·K50.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F
4.4 µm/m·K2.4 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 210 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 600°C1,112 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.48 µΩ·in
2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

1.9×10⁻⁵ Ω·cm
2×10⁻⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Same in both: Machinability 3 / 100 · Polishability 92 / 100 · Sintering / Firing Temperature 1,420°C2,588 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb
250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

30 kg CO₂/kg
20 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

79 kN·m/kg
73 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

43.8 MN·m/kg
43 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

31.3 mm²/s
27.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

40
34

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every ceramic grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,000234567Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC4YG3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

C4 vs YG3 — frequently asked

Is C4 stronger than YG3?

Yes. C4 has a typical tensile strength of 1,200 MPa (174 ksi) against 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) for YG3 — about 9% more.

Which is cheaper, C4 or YG3?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose C4 over YG3?

Pick C4 when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C4 and YG3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.