FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum Nitride vs Material 61

Ceramic · grade comparison

Aluminum Nitride and Material 61 are both ceramic grades. Aluminum Nitride is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for Material 61, about 6.7 times as much. Aluminum Nitride is harder — 1,100 HV against 620 HV for Material 61 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Aluminum Nitride is lighter (3.29 g/cm³ vs 4.7 g/cm³ for Material 61) and Aluminum Nitride is stiffer (320 GPa vs 150 GPa). On the shop floor, Material 61 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Aluminum Nitride (high, $$$$).

Aluminum NitrideChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Material 61Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

Aluminum Nitride vs Material 61: properties

Aluminum NitrideMaterial 61

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

320 GPa46.4 Msi
150 GPa21.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

128 GPa18.6 Msi
58 GPa8.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.24
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

200 MPa29 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Compressive Strength

2,100 MPa305 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Flexural Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Shear Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
1.2 MPa·√m1.1 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

1,100 HV
620 HV

Hardness, Knoop

1,200 HK
—

Hardness, Mohs

7.5
6

Same in both: Elongation at Break 0%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

3.29 g/cm³0.12 lb/in³
4.7 g/cm³0.17 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,200°C3,992 °F
1,550°C2,822 °F

Refractive Index

2.15
—

Porosity

0.5%
3%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

175 W/m·K101 BTU/hr·ft·°F
3.9 W/m·K2.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

740 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F
710 J/kg·K0.17 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F
8 µm/m·K4.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,000°C1,832 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-55°C-67 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1,000,000 Ω·m3.94×10¹³ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

17 kV/mm432 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

8.8
13

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

5×10⁻⁴
0.05

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10⁸ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

5 / 100
12 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Sintering / Firing Temperature

1,800°C3,272 °F
1,250°C2,282 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb
45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

20 kg CO₂/kg
3.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
10%

Embodied Water

—
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

61 kN·m/kg
6 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

97.3 MN·m/kg
31.9 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

71.9 mm²/s
1.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every ceramic grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,000234567Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAluminum Nitride

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAluminum NitrideMaterial 61
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Aluminum Nitride vs Material 61 — frequently asked

Is Aluminum Nitride stronger than Material 61?

Yes. Aluminum Nitride has a typical tensile strength of 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for Material 61 — about 6.7 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Aluminum Nitride or Material 61?

Material 61 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Aluminum Nitride is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Aluminum Nitride or Material 61?

Material 61, by a small margin. Both rate not recommended for machinability — 12/100 against 5/100 for Aluminum Nitride.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Aluminum Nitride and Material 61 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.