FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AlSi10Mg vs EN AC-71000

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AlSi10Mg and EN AC-71000 are both aluminum grades. AlSi10Mg is the stronger of the two: yield strength 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for EN AC-71000, about 83% more; tensile strength follows at 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). AlSi10Mg is the more ductile: elongation 7% versus 4% for EN AC-71000, and AlSi10Mg is harder (119 HB vs 62 HB). AlSi10Mg is lighter (2.67 g/cm³ vs 2.85 g/cm³ for EN AC-71000) and EN AC-71000 conducts electricity better (30 % IACS vs 24 % IACS). On the shop floor, EN AC-71000 machines more easily (very good vs fair), AlSi10Mg welds better (good vs fair), and EN AC-71000 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than AlSi10Mg (premium, $$$).

AlSi10MgChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

EN AC-71000Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when cost is the deciding factor.

AlSi10Mg vs EN AC-71000: properties

AlSi10MgEN AC-71000

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

460 MPa66.7 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

265 MPa38.4 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Elongation at Break

7%
4%

Compressive Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Shear Strength

280 MPa40.6 ksi
155 MPa22.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

22 MPa·√m20 ksi·√in
17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J2.6 ft·lbf
4 J3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

119 HB
62 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

66 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

125 HV
70 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.85 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

557°C1,035 °F
550°C1,022 °F

Liquidus Temperature

596°C1,105 °F
610°C1,130 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
125 W/m·K72.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F
22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

425 J/g183 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

24 % IACS
30 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in
5.75×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.26 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.95 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
72 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
70%

Weldability

60 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

92 / 100
62 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 10 / 100 · Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb
180 MJ/kg77,386 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

15 kg CO₂/kg
11.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

172 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

502 kJ/m³
146 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

49.9 mm²/s
49.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

38
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleEN AC-71000AlSi10Mg

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlSi10MgEN AC-71000
3D printingYes—
Default conditionAs Printed—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Anodized (Aluminum AM)Yes—
Plated (Metal AM)Yes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AlSi10Mg vs EN AC-71000 — frequently asked

Is AlSi10Mg stronger than EN AC-71000?

Yes. AlSi10Mg has a typical yield strength of 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for EN AC-71000 — about 83% more. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AlSi10Mg or EN AC-71000?

EN AC-71000 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while AlSi10Mg is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, AlSi10Mg or EN AC-71000?

EN AC-71000. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against fair (50/100) for AlSi10Mg; for welding the order is AlSi10Mg first (good, 60/100) then EN AC-71000 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AlSi10Mg and EN AC-71000 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.