FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 8079 vs 8091

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 8079 and 8091 are both aluminum grades. 8091 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for 8079, about 14 times as much; tensile strength follows at 540 MPa (78.3 ksi) vs 85 MPa (12.3 ksi). In exchange, 8079 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 5% for 8091, and 8091 is harder (155 HB vs 22 HB). 8091 is lighter (2.55 g/cm³ vs 2.72 g/cm³ for 8079) and 8091 is stiffer (80 GPa vs 69 GPa). On the shop floor, 8091 machines more easily (good vs poor), 8079 welds better (very good vs poor), and 8079 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 8091 (high, $$$$).

8079Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

8091Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

8079 vs 8091: properties

80798091

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
30 GPa4.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

85 MPa12.3 ksi
540 MPa78.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

35 MPa5.1 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
5%

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

35 MPa5.1 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

22 HB
155 HB

Compressive Strength

—
495 MPa71.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

—
165 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.55 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

645°C1,193 °F
570°C1,058 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

225 W/m·K130 BTU/hr·ft·°F
95 W/m·K54.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
21.4 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

58 % IACS
19 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.97×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.17 µΩ·in
9.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.58 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.73 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
70%

Weldability

75 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
260 MJ/kg111,780 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
18 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

25%
3%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
212 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.4 MN·m/kg
31.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

9 kJ/m³
1,440 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

91.9 mm²/s
41.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
30

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale80798091

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability80798091
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

8079 vs 8091 — frequently asked

Is 8091 stronger than 8079?

Yes. 8091 has a typical yield strength of 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for 8079 — about 14 times as much. Tensile strength is 540 MPa (78.3 ksi) vs 85 MPa (12.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 8079 or 8091?

8079 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 8091 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 8079 or 8091?

8091. Its machinability rates good (65/100) against poor (30/100) for 8079; for welding the order is 8079 first (very good, 75/100) then 8091 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 8079 and 8091 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.