FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6005A vs 6B02

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6005A and 6B02 are both aluminum grades. Both yield at about 235 MPa — strength does not separate them. 6005A conducts heat better (190 W/m·K vs 170 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 6005A welds better (excellent vs very good) and 6005A sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6B02 (standard, $$).

6005AChoose it when it will be welded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

6005A vs 6B02: properties

6005A6B02

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69.5 GPa10.1 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
12%

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

18 J13.3 ft·lbf
22 J16.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
58 HRB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 235 MPa34.1 ksi · Compressive Strength 235 MPa34.1 ksi · Shear Strength 180 MPa26.1 ksi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 90 MPa13.1 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in · Hardness, Brinell 95 HB · Hardness, Vickers 100 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
585°C1,085 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F
170 W/m·K98.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
896 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

393 J/g169 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

49 % IACS
43 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.38 µΩ·in
4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.57 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.75 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
58 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

190%
50%

Weldability

85 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 40 / 100 · Castability 25 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

102 kN·m/kg
100 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.7 MN·m/kg
25.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

397 kJ/m³
400 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

78.5 mm²/s
70.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
28

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale6005A6B02

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability6005A6B02
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6005A vs 6B02 — frequently asked

What is the difference between 6005A and 6B02?

Aluminum 6005A and 6B02 are both aluminum grades. Both yield at about 235 MPa — strength does not separate them. 6005A conducts heat better (190 W/m·K vs 170 W/m·K).

Which is cheaper, 6005A or 6B02?

6005A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6B02 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 6005A or 6B02?

6005A. Its weldability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (75/100) for 6B02.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6005A and 6B02 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.