FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6005A vs 6205

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6005A and 6205 are both aluminum grades. 6205 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) for 6005A, about 23% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi). 6005A conducts electricity better (49 % IACS vs 44 % IACS). On the shop floor, 6005A machines more easily (good vs fair), 6005A welds better (excellent vs very good), and 6005A sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6205 (standard, $$).

6005AChoose it when the part is machined in volume, or when it will be welded.

6205Choose it when strength drives the design.

6005A vs 6205: properties

6005A6205

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69.5 GPa10.1 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Compressive Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
—

Shear Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
193 MPa28 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
103 MPa14.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

18 J13.3 ft·lbf
—

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 11% · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in · Hardness, Brinell 95 HB · Hardness, Vickers 100 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
652°C1,206 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 607°C1,125 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F
172 W/m·K99.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
896 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

393 J/g169 BTU/lb
397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

49 % IACS
44 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.38 µΩ·in
3.92×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.54 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.76 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
52 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

190%
35%

Weldability

85 / 100
72 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 40 / 100 · Castability 25 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

102 kN·m/kg
115 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.7 MN·m/kg
25.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

397 kJ/m³
609 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

78.5 mm²/s
71.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 33

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale6005A6205

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability6005A6205
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6005A vs 6205 — frequently asked

Is 6205 stronger than 6005A?

Yes. 6205 has a typical yield strength of 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) for 6005A — about 23% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6005A or 6205?

6005A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6205 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 6005A or 6205?

6005A. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (52/100) for 6205; for welding the order is 6005A first (excellent, 85/100) then 6205 (very good, 72/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6005A and 6205 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.