FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6005A vs 6105

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6005A and 6105 are both aluminum grades. Both yield at about 235 MPa — strength does not separate them. 6005A is harder — 95 HB against 76 HB for 6105 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, 6005A welds better (excellent vs very good) and 6005A sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6105 (standard, $$).

6005AChoose it when surface hardness matters, or when it will be welded.

6005A vs 6105: properties

6005A6105

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69.5 GPa10.1 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
68 GPa9.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
262 MPa38 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
241 MPa35 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
10%

Compressive Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
—

Shear Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
97 MPa14.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

18 J13.3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
76 HB

Hardness, Vickers

100 HV
85 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
615°C1,139 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 654°C1,209 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F
180 W/m·K104 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
895 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

393 J/g169 BTU/lb
397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

49 % IACS
47 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.38 µΩ·in
3.67×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.44 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

190%
45%

Weldability

85 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 40 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

30%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

102 kN·m/kg
97 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

397 kJ/m³
421 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

78.5 mm²/s
74.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
29

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.7 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale6005A6105

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability6005A6105
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6005A vs 6105 — frequently asked

What is the difference between 6005A and 6105?

Aluminum 6005A and 6105 are both aluminum grades. Both yield at about 235 MPa — strength does not separate them. 6005A is harder — 95 HB against 76 HB for 6105 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads.

Which is cheaper, 6005A or 6105?

6005A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6105 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 6005A or 6105?

6005A, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 62/100 against 55/100 for 6105; for welding the order is 6005A first (excellent, 85/100) then 6105 (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6005A and 6105 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.