FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6005A vs 6063A

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6005A and 6063A are both aluminum grades. 6005A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) for 6063A, about 15% more; tensile strength follows at 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) vs 245 MPa (35.5 ksi). 6005A is harder — 95 HB against 80 HB for 6063A — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, 6005A machines more easily (good vs fair) and 6005A sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6063A (standard, $$).

6005AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

6005A vs 6063A: properties

6005A6063A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
245 MPa35.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
10%

Compressive Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Shear Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in
32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

18 J13.3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Vickers

100 HV
88 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69.5 GPa10.1 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
615°C1,139 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
655°C1,211 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F
200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 393 J/g169 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 49 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 3.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.38 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.78 V · Corrosion Resistance 68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
48 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

190%
45%

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 85 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

102 kN·m/kg
91 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.7 MN·m/kg
25.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

397 kJ/m³
302 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

78.5 mm²/s
82.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
30

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale6005A6063A

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability6005A6063A
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6005A vs 6063A — frequently asked

Is 6005A stronger than 6063A?

Yes. 6005A has a typical yield strength of 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) for 6063A — about 15% more. Tensile strength is 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) vs 245 MPa (35.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6005A or 6063A?

6005A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6063A is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 6005A or 6063A?

6005A. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (48/100) for 6063A.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6005A and 6063A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.