FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6003 vs 6005A

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6003 and 6005A are both aluminum grades. 6005A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) for 6003, about 15% more; tensile strength follows at 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) vs 240 MPa (34.8 ksi). 6005A is harder — 95 HB against 75 HB for 6003 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, 6005A machines more easily (good vs fair), 6003 forms better (50 vs 40 out of 100), and 6005A sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6003 (standard, $$).

6005AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

6003 vs 6005A: properties

60036005A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
69.5 GPa10.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

205 MPa29.7 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
11%

Compressive Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

75 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Vickers

82 HV
100 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
18 J13.3 ft·lbf

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 90 MPa13.1 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

615°C1,139 °F
607°C1,125 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
654°C1,209 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

175 W/m·K101 BTU/hr·ft·°F
190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F
23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
393 J/g169 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

45 % IACS
49 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.83×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.51 µΩ·in
3.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.38 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.8 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
190%

Weldability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

89 kN·m/kg
102 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

305 kJ/m³
397 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

72.3 mm²/s
78.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

26
33

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale6005A6003

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60036005A
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6003 vs 6005A — frequently asked

Is 6005A stronger than 6003?

Yes. 6005A has a typical yield strength of 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) for 6003 — about 15% more. Tensile strength is 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) vs 240 MPa (34.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6003 or 6005A?

6005A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6003 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 6003 or 6005A?

6005A. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (50/100) for 6003; for welding the order is 6005A first (excellent, 85/100) then 6003 (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6003 and 6005A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.