FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5050 vs 5252

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5050 and 5252 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 5252 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for 5050, about 17% more; tensile strength follows at 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) vs 170 MPa (24.7 ksi). 5252 is the more ductile: elongation 11% versus 9% for 5050, and 5252 is harder (68 HB vs 46 HB). 5050 conducts heat better (191 W/m·K vs 138 W/m·K).

5252Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5050 vs 5252: properties

50505252

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
68 GPa9.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

145 MPa21 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

9%
11%

Shear Strength

115 MPa16.7 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

46 HB
68 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 68.9 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 25.9 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

627°C1,161 °F
607°C1,125 °F

Liquidus Temperature

652°C1,206 °F
654°C1,209 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

191 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F
138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

50 % IACS
35 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.45×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.36 µΩ·in
4.93×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.94 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.86 V

Corrosion Resistance

75 / 100
66 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
42 / 100

Weldability

85 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
68 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
88 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

35%
15%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

63 kN·m/kg
88 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
25.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

153 kJ/m³
210 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

78.9 mm²/s
57.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50505252

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50505252
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

5050 vs 5252 — frequently asked

Is 5252 stronger than 5050?

Yes. 5252 has a typical yield strength of 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for 5050 — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) vs 170 MPa (24.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5050 or 5252?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 5050 or 5252?

5050. Its weldability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (78/100) for 5252.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5050 and 5252 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.