FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2055-T3 vs 2055-T8511

Aluminum · 2055 temper comparison

2055-T3 and 2055-T8511 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 2055: T3 (solution heat treated, cold worked and naturally aged) versus T8511 (T84 process with stress relief by stretching plus minor straightening). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 2055-T8511 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 595 MPa (86.3 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 2055-T3, about 86% more; tensile strength follows at 635 MPa (92.1 ksi) vs 460 MPa (66.7 ksi). In exchange, 2055-T3 is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 10% for 2055-T8511, and 2055-T8511 is harder (178 HB vs 130 HB). 2055-T8511 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 100°C continuous) and 2055-T8511 conducts electricity better (27 % IACS vs 24 % IACS). On the shop floor, 2055-T8511 machines more easily (very good vs good).

2055-T3Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

2055-T8511Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

2055-T3 vs 2055-T8511: properties

2055-T32055-T8511

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

77 GPa11.2 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

460 MPa66.7 ksi
635 MPa92.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
595 MPa86.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
10%

Compressive Strength

335 MPa48.6 ksi
625 MPa90.6 ksi

Shear Strength

285 MPa41.3 ksi
375 MPa54.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
225 MPa32.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in
33 MPa·√m30 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

130 HB
178 HB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 29.5 GPa4.3 Msi · Bulk Modulus 73 GPa10.6 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.74 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 545°C1,013 °F · Liquidus Temperature 640°C1,184 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

86 W/m·K49.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
95 W/m·K54.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 870 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 22.6 µm/m·K12.6 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

24 % IACS
27 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in
6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.75 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
22 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 10 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 13 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 5%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2055

2055-T3 vs 2055-T8511 — frequently asked

Is 2055-T8511 stronger than 2055-T3?

Yes. 2055-T8511 has a typical yield strength of 595 MPa (86.3 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for 2055-T3 — about 86% more. Tensile strength is 635 MPa (92.1 ksi) vs 460 MPa (66.7 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, T3 or T8511?

T84 is the default 2055 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither T3 nor T8511). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 2055-T3 or 2055-T8511?

2055-T8511. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (60/100) for 2055-T3; for welding the order is 2055-T3 first (poor, 25/100) then 2055-T8511 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2055-T3 and 2055-T8511 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.