FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2018 vs 2030

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2018 and 2030 are both aluminum grades. 2018 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) against 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) for 2030, about 11% more. 2018 is harder — 120 HB against 100 HB for 2030 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 2018 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 100°C continuous) and 2018 conducts heat better (154 W/m·K vs 134 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 2030 machines more easily (excellent vs very good), 2018 welds better (poor vs not recommended), and 2030 forms better (fair vs poor).

2018Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

2030Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

2018 vs 2030: properties

20182030

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
73 GPa10.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

28 GPa4.1 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

315 MPa45.7 ksi
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Compressive Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
—

Shear Strength

275 MPa39.9 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

22 MPa·√m20 ksi·√in
24 MPa·√m21.8 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

120 HB
100 HB

Hardness, Vickers

128 HV
108 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 12%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.8 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.82 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

507°C945 °F
510°C950 °F

Liquidus Temperature

638°C1,180 °F
640°C1,184 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

154 W/m·K89 BTU/hr·ft·°F
134 W/m·K77.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

875 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
870 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.3 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

40 % IACS
32 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.31×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.7 µΩ·in
5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.7 V
-0.69 V

Corrosion Resistance

33 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
92 / 100

Weldability

22 / 100
12 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
90%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
10%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

150 kN·m/kg
142 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.4 MN·m/kg
25.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

670 kJ/m³
556 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

62.9 mm²/s
54.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

39
32

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale20302018

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability20182030
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

2018 vs 2030 — frequently asked

Is 2018 stronger than 2030?

Yes. 2018 has a typical yield strength of 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) against 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) for 2030 — about 11% more. Tensile strength is 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) vs 400 MPa (58 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2018 or 2030?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 2018 or 2030?

2030. Its machinability rates excellent (92/100) against very good (72/100) for 2018; for welding the order is 2018 first (poor, 22/100) then 2030 (not recommended, 12/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2018 and 2030 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.