FabDigit

EPS vs ABS

Benchmark · 2 materials

EPS and ABS are both polymer grades. ABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 0.2 MPa (0.029 ksi) for EPS, about 210 times as much; tensile strength follows at 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) vs 0.25 MPa (0.0363 ksi). ABS is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 3% for EPS. EPS is lighter (0.02 g/cm³ vs 1.04 g/cm³ for ABS) and ABS is stiffer (2.3 GPa vs 0.01 GPa). On the shop floor, EPS machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and ABS welds better (very good vs fair).

EPSChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

EPS vs ABS: properties

EPSABS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.1
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.25 MPa0.04 ksi
43 MPa6.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

0.2 MPa0.03 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
25%

Compressive Strength

0.11 MPa0.02 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Flexural Strength

0.26 MPa0.04 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0 GPa6.53×10⁻⁴ Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Shear Strength

0.11 MPa0.02 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.02 g/cm³7.23×10⁻⁴ lb/in³
1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

100°C212 °F
105°C221 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.5%
0.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

4%
1%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,350 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F
1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

96°C205 °F
100°C212 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
95°C203 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 75°C167 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.03
2.9

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

3×10⁻⁴
0.009

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
68 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

15 / 100
22 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
82 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
0.55%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

110°C230 °F
60°C140 °F

Polishability

60 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.4 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

13 kN·m/kg
41 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.3 MN·m/kg
2.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

4 kJ/m³
383 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

1.3 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSEPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEPSABS
CNC machiningYes
Sheet metalYes
Injection moldingYes
3D printingYes
Default conditionUnfilled
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes
Conductive CoatingYes
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes
EMI Shielding CoatingYes
PaintingYes
Primer CoatingYes
Soft Touch CoatingYes
Spray PaintingYes
Tinted CoatingYes
UV CoatingYes
Vacuum MetallizationYes
Waterproof CoatingYes

EPS vs ABS — frequently asked

Is ABS stronger than EPS?

Yes. ABS has a typical yield strength of 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 0.2 MPa (0.029 ksi) for EPS — about 210 times as much. Tensile strength is 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) vs 0.25 MPa (0.0363 ksi).

Which is cheaper, EPS or ABS?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, EPS or ABS?

EPS. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (80/100) for ABS; for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then EPS (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EPS and ABS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.