FabDigitFabDigit

Cross-group finish comparison

EMI Shielding Coating vs Vacuum Metallization

EMI Shielding Coating (coatings for plastics) and Vacuum Metallization (plating & metallizing on plastics) solve the same problem by different routes; vacuum metallization resists corrosion better.

EMI Shielding Coating on a machined part

EMI Shielding Coating

Coatings for plastics · $$$$ · instant quote

EMI shielding coating is a conductive metal-filled paint applied mainly to the inside of nonconductive enclosures.

Vacuum Metallization on a machined part

Vacuum Metallization

Plating & metallizing on plastics · $$$$ · instant quote

Vacuum metallization evaporates aluminum or another metal onto prepared plastic to create a reflective or conductive-looking film.

When to choose which

Choose EMI coating

EMI coating is the pick when its strengths below matter more than Vacuum metallization's.

  • Converts polymer housings into conductive shielding surfaces
  • Typical v1 film is 15–30 µm
  • Spray reaches complex interior enclosure geometry

Choose Vacuum metallization

Choose Vacuum metallization when a thinner deposited metal layer is preferred.

  • Mirror-like appearance at 0.05–1 µm
  • Low added mass
  • Works on moulded and printed polymers

What the numbers say

  • Vacuum metallization resists corrosion better.
  • EMI coating is the lower-cost option ($$$$).
  • Vacuum metallization is the thinner coating (0.05–1 µm), so it disturbs tight fits less.

Scores side by side

Each score is 0–100 against every finish in this catalog. Corrosion is derived from salt-spray test duration and surface hardness from the finish layer's Vickers hardness where a measured figure exists; a finish that leaves the base metal's own surface is not rated for hardness. Cosmetic, lubricity and cost are FabDigit's engineering assessment. Scores and typical figures are screening data, not matched side-by-side tests or service-life rankings; ASTM B117 is a controlled salt-fog method, not a field-life prediction.

ScoreEMI coatingVacuum metallization
Corrosion resistance20 Low45 Fair
Surface hardness / wear— —— —
Cosmetic quality25 Low94 Excellent
Lubricity15 Low20 Low
Cost65 $$$$65 $$$$
CorrosionHardnessCosmeticLubricityEconomy
EMI coatingVacuum metallization

Key numbers

PropertyEMI coatingVacuum metallization
Thickness15–30 µm0.05–1 µm
Max service temperature—80 °C
ElectricalConductiveConductive
Colourssilver, copper, graybright aluminum, chrome-look, gold tint, custom tint
Relative costHigh ($$$$)High ($$$$)
Added lead time4–8 working days7–14 working days
RoHSCompliantCompliant
Instant quoteYesYes

Bold marks the side that is ahead on a row where more (or less, for cost and lead time) is better. Ranges are the typical specification window; the drawing call-out fixes the class.

Which materials take each finish

Material familyEMI coatingVacuum metallization
PolymerYesYes
SLAWith careYes
BrassWith careNo
CompositeWith careWith care
Copper AlloyWith careNo
FDMWith careWith care
Magnesium AlloyWith careNo
MJFWith careWith care
SLSWith careWith care
Zinc AlloyWith careNo
AluminumLimitedLimited
Stainless SteelLimitedNo
SteelLimitedNo
TitaniumLimitedNo

EMI coating vs Vacuum metallization — frequently asked

What is the difference between EMI coating and Vacuum metallization?

EMI Shielding Coating (coatings for plastics) and Vacuum Metallization (plating & metallizing on plastics) solve the same problem by different routes; vacuum metallization resists corrosion better. EMI coating is the lower-cost option ($$$$). Vacuum metallization is the thinner coating (0.05–1 µm), so it disturbs tight fits less.

When should I use EMI coating instead of Vacuum metallization?

Conversely: choose Vacuum metallization when a thinner deposited metal layer is preferred.

Is EMI coating or Vacuum metallization cheaper?

EMI coating is the lower-cost finish ($$$$ against $$$$ for Vacuum metallization) among the finishes FabDigit quotes. Both are priced per part with a lot minimum; the exact figure appears on the instant quote once the part is uploaded.