FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Grade 13 vs Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Grade 13 and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si are both titanium grades. Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si is the stronger of the two: yield strength 930 MPa (135 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for Grade 13, about 3.9 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,010 MPa (146 ksi) vs 345 MPa (50 ksi). In exchange, Grade 13 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 15% for Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si, and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si is harder (320 HB vs 130 HB). Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si is stiffer (114 GPa vs 105 GPa) and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si runs hotter in service (510°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, Grade 13 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and Grade 13 welds better (excellent vs good).

Grade 13Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1SiChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Grade 13 vs Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si: properties

Grade 13Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
114 GPa16.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

40 GPa5.8 Msi
44.5 GPa6.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
107 GPa15.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

345 MPa50 ksi
1,010 MPa146 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
930 MPa135 ksi

Elongation at Break

28%
15%

Reduction in Area

45%
33%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
970 MPa141 ksi

Shear Strength

240 MPa34.8 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in
55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

130 HB
320 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

72 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

140 HV
330 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
32 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.54 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

1,675°C3,047 °F
1,705°C3,101 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,650°C3,002 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

17.5 W/m·K10.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
7 W/m·K4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

520 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F
7.7 µm/m·K4.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
510°C950 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
0.87 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22 µΩ·in
1.98×10⁻⁶ Ω·m78 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

93 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
18%

Weldability

88 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

72 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

660 MJ/kg283,749 BTU/lb
680 MJ/kg292,348 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

45 kg CO₂/kg
40 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,500 L/kg180 gal/lb
800 L/kg95.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

76 kN·m/kg
222 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.3 MN·m/kg
25.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

274 kJ/m³
3,793 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.5 mm²/s
3.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleGrade 13Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityGrade 13Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Grade 13 vs Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si — frequently asked

Is Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si stronger than Grade 13?

Yes. Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si has a typical yield strength of 930 MPa (135 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for Grade 13 — about 3.9 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,010 MPa (146 ksi) vs 345 MPa (50 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Grade 13 or Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Grade 13 or Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si?

Grade 13. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (18/100) for Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si; for welding the order is Grade 13 first (excellent, 88/100) then Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Grade 13 and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.