FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Grade 13 vs Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Grade 13 and Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo are both titanium grades. Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo is the stronger of the two: yield strength 950 MPa (138 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for Grade 13, about 4.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,035 MPa (150 ksi) vs 345 MPa (50 ksi). In exchange, Grade 13 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 12% for Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo, and Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo is harder (320 HB vs 130 HB). Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo is stiffer (117 GPa vs 105 GPa) and Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo runs hotter in service (480°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, Grade 13 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and Grade 13 welds better (excellent vs good).

Grade 13Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2MoChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Grade 13 vs Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo: properties

Grade 13Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
117 GPa17 Msi

Shear Modulus

40 GPa5.8 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

345 MPa50 ksi
1,035 MPa150 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Elongation at Break

28%
12%

Reduction in Area

45%
25%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Shear Strength

240 MPa34.8 ksi
660 MPa95.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
14 J10.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

130 HB
320 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

72 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

140 HV
335 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
34 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 110 GPa16 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.55 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,650°C3,002 °F
1,600°C2,912 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,675°C3,047 °F
1,660°C3,020 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

17.5 W/m·K10.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
7.5 W/m·K4.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

520 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
530 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F
9 µm/m·K5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
480°C896 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
1.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁶ Ω·m63 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

93 / 100
88 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
18%

Weldability

88 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

72 / 100
22 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

—
35 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

660 MJ/kg283,749 BTU/lb
700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

45 kg CO₂/kg
42 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,500 L/kg180 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

76 kN·m/kg
227 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.3 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

274 kJ/m³
3,857 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.5 mm²/s
3.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleGrade 13Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityGrade 13Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Grade 13 vs Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo — frequently asked

Is Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo stronger than Grade 13?

Yes. Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo has a typical yield strength of 950 MPa (138 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for Grade 13 — about 4.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,035 MPa (150 ksi) vs 345 MPa (50 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Grade 13 or Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Grade 13 or Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo?

Grade 13. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (18/100) for Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo; for welding the order is Grade 13 first (excellent, 88/100) then Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Grade 13 and Ti-5Al-5Sn-2Zr-2Mo side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.