FabDigitFabDigit

Steel T7A-A vs T7A QT54-57

Steel · T7A temper comparison

T7A-A and T7A QT54-57 are two conditions of the same steel grade, T7A: A (solution annealed) versus QT54-57 (Q&T 54–57 HRC). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. T7A QT54-57 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,650 MPa (239 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for T7A-A, about 4.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,950 MPa (283 ksi) vs 660 MPa (95.7 ksi). In exchange, T7A-A is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 2% for T7A QT54-57, and T7A QT54-57 is harder (580 HB vs 180 HB). T7A-A runs hotter in service (300°C vs 200°C continuous) and T7A-A conducts heat better (48 W/m·K vs 42 W/m·K). On the shop floor, T7A-A machines more easily (good vs not recommended) and T7A-A welds better (poor vs not recommended).

T7A-AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

T7A QT54-57Choose it when strength drives the design.

T7A-A vs T7A QT54-57: properties

T7A-AT7A QT54-57

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

660 MPa95.7 ksi
1,950 MPa283 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
1,650 MPa239 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
2%

Reduction in Area

40%
5%

Compressive Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
2,350 MPa341 ksi

Shear Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
1,150 MPa167 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

180 HB
580 HB

Hardness, Vickers

190 HV
610 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 207 GPa30 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Hardness, Rockwell B 89 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.83 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,480°C2,696 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.09 µΩ·in
2.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.46 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.61 V · Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
14 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
8%

Weldability

20 / 100
5 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
3 / 100

Same in both: Castability 30 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.1 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleT7A

T7A-A vs T7A QT54-57 — frequently asked

Is T7A QT54-57 stronger than T7A-A?

Yes. T7A QT54-57 has a typical yield strength of 1,650 MPa (239 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for T7A-A — about 4.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,950 MPa (283 ksi) vs 660 MPa (95.7 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, A or QT54-57?

A is the default T7A condition in the FabDigit quote flow. The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, T7A-A or T7A QT54-57?

T7A-A. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against not recommended (14/100) for T7A QT54-57; for welding the order is T7A-A first (poor, 20/100) then T7A QT54-57 (not recommended, 5/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in T7A-A and T7A QT54-57 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.