FabDigitFabDigit

Steel SKD61 Q&T vs SKD61 Q&T 52-54 HRC

Steel · SKD61 temper comparison

SKD61 Q&T and SKD61 Q&T 52-54 HRC are two conditions of the same steel grade, SKD61: Q&T (quenched and tempered) versus Q&T 52-54 HRC (low-temper, maximum hardness). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. SKD61 Q&T 52-54 HRC is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,650 MPa (239 ksi) against 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) for SKD61 Q&T, about 32% more; tensile strength follows at 1,950 MPa (283 ksi) vs 1,500 MPa (218 ksi). In exchange, SKD61 Q&T is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 8% for SKD61 Q&T 52-54 HRC, and SKD61 Q&T 52-54 HRC is harder (53 HRC vs 46 HRC). SKD61 Q&T runs hotter in service (560°C vs 480°C continuous). On the shop floor, SKD61 Q&T machines more easily (poor vs not recommended).

SKD61 Q&TChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

SKD61 Q&T 52-54 HRCChoose it when strength drives the design.

SKD61 Q&T vs SKD61 Q&T 52-54 HRC: properties

SKD61 Q&TSKD61 Q&T 52-54 HRC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

211 GPa30.6 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,500 MPa218 ksi
1,950 MPa283 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,250 MPa181 ksi
1,650 MPa239 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
8%

Reduction in Area

40%
50%

Shear Strength

900 MPa131 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

640 MPa92.8 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

18 J13.3 ft·lbf
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

46 HRC
53 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

465 HV
590 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 81 GPa11.7 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Hardness, Brinell 215 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,427°C2,601 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

560°C1,040 °F
480°C896 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 24.5 W/m·K14.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 3.3 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V · Corrosion Resistance 20 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
8 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

15%
55%

Same in both: Weldability 35 / 100 · Formability (cold) 30 / 100 · Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 36 MJ/kg15,477 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.8 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 65 L/kg7.8 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSKD61

SKD61 Q&T vs SKD61 Q&T 52-54 HRC — frequently asked

Is SKD61 Q&T 52-54 HRC stronger than SKD61 Q&T?

Yes. SKD61 Q&T 52-54 HRC has a typical yield strength of 1,650 MPa (239 ksi) against 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) for SKD61 Q&T — about 32% more. Tensile strength is 1,950 MPa (283 ksi) vs 1,500 MPa (218 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, Q&T or Q&T 52-54 HRC?

Annealed is the default SKD61 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither Q&T nor Q&T 52-54 HRC). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, SKD61 Q&T or SKD61 Q&T 52-54 HRC?

SKD61 Q&T. Its machinability rates poor (20/100) against not recommended (8/100) for SKD61 Q&T 52-54 HRC.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in SKD61 Q&T and SKD61 Q&T 52-54 HRC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.