FabDigitFabDigit

Steel SACM645-N vs SACM645 Q&T+NIT

Steel · SACM645 temper comparison

SACM645-N and SACM645 Q&T+NIT are two conditions of the same steel grade, SACM645: N (normalized) versus Q&T+NIT (Q&T + Nitrided). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. SACM645 Q&T+NIT is the stronger of the two: yield strength 790 MPa (115 ksi) against 690 MPa (100 ksi) for SACM645-N, about 14% more; tensile strength follows at 960 MPa (139 ksi) vs 900 MPa (131 ksi). SACM645 Q&T+NIT is harder — 67 HRC against 26 HRC for SACM645-N — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. SACM645 Q&T+NIT runs hotter in service (500°C vs 450°C continuous). On the shop floor, SACM645-N machines more easily (fair vs not recommended).

SACM645-NChoose it when the part is machined in volume.

SACM645 Q&T+NITChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

SACM645-N vs SACM645 Q&T+NIT: properties

SACM645-NSACM645 Q&T+NIT

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

900 MPa131 ksi
960 MPa139 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

690 MPa100 ksi
790 MPa115 ksi

Compressive Strength

700 MPa102 ksi
790 MPa115 ksi

Shear Strength

540 MPa78.3 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
540 MPa78.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in
70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

55 J40.6 ft·lbf
40 J29.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

262 HB
270 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

26 HRC
67 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

275 HV
1,000 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 207 GPa30 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Elongation at Break 15% · Reduction in Area 48%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,490°C2,714 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

38 W/m·K22 BTU/hr·ft·°F
36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
500°C932 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 465 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.7 % IACS
7.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.24×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.82 µΩ·in
2.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.06 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

15 / 100
22 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

44 / 100
8 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

47%
8%

Weldability

20 / 100
18 / 100

Formability (cold)

32 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 28%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSACM645

SACM645-N vs SACM645 Q&T+NIT — frequently asked

Is SACM645 Q&T+NIT stronger than SACM645-N?

Yes. SACM645 Q&T+NIT has a typical yield strength of 790 MPa (115 ksi) against 690 MPa (100 ksi) for SACM645-N — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 960 MPa (139 ksi) vs 900 MPa (131 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, N or Q&T+NIT?

Q&T is the default SACM645 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither N nor Q&T+NIT). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, SACM645-N or SACM645 Q&T+NIT?

SACM645-N. Its machinability rates fair (44/100) against not recommended (8/100) for SACM645 Q&T+NIT.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in SACM645-N and SACM645 Q&T+NIT side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.