FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A656 vs A992

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A656 and A992 are both steel grades, both structural steel. A656 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 580 MPa (84.1 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for A992, about 53% more; tensile strength follows at 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) vs 500 MPa (72.5 ksi). In exchange, A992 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 16% for A656, and A656 is harder (215 HB vs 150 HB). A992 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous) and A992 conducts electricity better (10 % IACS vs 9 % IACS). On the shop floor, A992 machines more easily (good vs fair), A992 welds better (excellent vs very good), and A656 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A992 (standard, $$).

A656Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

A992Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

A656 vs A992: properties

A656A992

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

660 MPa95.7 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

580 MPa84.1 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
25%

Reduction in Area

50%
55%

Compressive Strength

580 MPa84.1 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

290 MPa42.1 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in
110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

80 J59 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

215 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

96 HRB
80 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

18 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

225 HV
—

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,510°C2,750 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

46 W/m·K26.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
11.7 µm/m·K6.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

350°C662 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.48 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.62 V
-0.61 V

Corrosion Resistance

12 / 100
10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
65%

Weldability

75 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
21 MJ/kg9,028 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
1.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb
25 L/kg3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
93%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

84 kN·m/kg
64 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

841 kJ/m³
361 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.2 mm²/s
13.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
11

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.5 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA656A992

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA656A992
Default conditionHRHR
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

A656 vs A992 — frequently asked

Is A656 stronger than A992?

Yes. A656 has a typical yield strength of 580 MPa (84.1 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for A992 — about 53% more. Tensile strength is 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) vs 500 MPa (72.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A656 or A992?

A656 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A992 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, A656 or A992?

A992. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (50/100) for A656; for welding the order is A992 first (excellent, 90/100) then A656 (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A656 and A992 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.