FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A283 vs Q235C

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A283 and Q235C are both steel grades. Q235C is the stronger of the two: yield strength 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) against 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) for A283, about 15% more. Q235C is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 25% for A283. A283 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous).

A283Choose it when the part sees heat.

Q235CChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

A283 vs Q235C: properties

A283Q235C

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
30%

Reduction in Area

45%
58%

Compressive Strength

230 MPa33.4 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Shear Strength

270 MPa39.2 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

27 J19.9 ft·lbf
90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

120 HB
125 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

68 HRB
70 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

126 HV
130 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 79 GPa11.5 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

51 W/m·K29.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.7 µm/m·K6.5 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

247 J/g106 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
0°C32 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10.8 % IACS
10.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in
1.65×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.65 V
-0.62 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

70%
72%

Formability (cold)

78 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 65 / 100 · Weldability 95 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

54 kN·m/kg
55 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

132 kJ/m³
167 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.8 mm²/s
13.6 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA283Q235C

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA283Q235C
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A283 vs Q235C — frequently asked

Is Q235C stronger than A283?

Yes. Q235C has a typical yield strength of 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) against 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) for A283 — about 15% more. Tensile strength is 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) vs 420 MPa (60.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A283 or Q235C?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose A283 over Q235C?

Pick A283 when the part sees heat. Pick Q235C when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A283 and Q235C side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.