FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 9Cr18-CD vs 9Cr18 QT55-58

Steel · 9Cr18 temper comparison

9Cr18-CD and 9Cr18 QT55-58 are two conditions of the same steel grade, 9Cr18: CD (cold drawn) versus QT55-58 (Q&T 55–58 HRC). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 9Cr18 QT55-58 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,740 MPa (252 ksi) against 700 MPa (102 ksi) for 9Cr18-CD, about 149% more; tensile strength follows at 1,930 MPa (280 ksi) vs 900 MPa (131 ksi). In exchange, 9Cr18-CD is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 3% for 9Cr18 QT55-58, and 9Cr18-CD is harder (275 HB vs 225 HB). 9Cr18-CD runs hotter in service (350°C vs 180°C continuous). On the shop floor, 9Cr18-CD machines more easily (fair vs not recommended).

9Cr18-CDChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

9Cr18 QT55-58Choose it when strength drives the design.

9Cr18-CD vs 9Cr18 QT55-58: properties

9Cr18-CD9Cr18 QT55-58

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

900 MPa131 ksi
1,930 MPa280 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

700 MPa102 ksi
1,740 MPa252 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
3%

Reduction in Area

30%
8%

Compressive Strength

720 MPa104 ksi
2,400 MPa348 ksi

Shear Strength

540 MPa78.3 ksi
1,150 MPa167 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
780 MPa113 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

10 J7.4 ft·lbf
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

275 HB
225 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

104 HRB
97 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

290 HV
650 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Shear Modulus 78 GPa11.3 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.28

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,370°C2,498 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

350°C662 °F
180°C356 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 10.4 µm/m·K5.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.9 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
48 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

48 / 100
10 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

48%
8%

Weldability

15 / 100
8 / 100

Formability (cold)

18 / 100
3 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: Castability 30 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.4 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 100 L/kg12 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 40%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale9Cr18

9Cr18-CD vs 9Cr18 QT55-58 — frequently asked

Is 9Cr18 QT55-58 stronger than 9Cr18-CD?

Yes. 9Cr18 QT55-58 has a typical yield strength of 1,740 MPa (252 ksi) against 700 MPa (102 ksi) for 9Cr18-CD — about 149% more. Tensile strength is 1,930 MPa (280 ksi) vs 900 MPa (131 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, CD or QT55-58?

A is the default 9Cr18 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither CD nor QT55-58). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 9Cr18-CD or 9Cr18 QT55-58?

9Cr18-CD. Its machinability rates fair (48/100) against not recommended (10/100) for 9Cr18 QT55-58; for welding the order is 9Cr18-CD first (poor, 15/100) then 9Cr18 QT55-58 (not recommended, 8/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 9Cr18-CD and 9Cr18 QT55-58 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.