FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 94B15-HR vs 94B15 QT-28-32HRC

Steel · 94B15 temper comparison

94B15-HR and 94B15 QT-28-32HRC are two conditions of the same steel grade, 94B15: HR (hot rolled) versus QT-28-32HRC. The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 94B15 QT-28-32HRC is the stronger of the two: yield strength 790 MPa (115 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for 94B15-HR, about 119% more; tensile strength follows at 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 545 MPa (79 ksi). In exchange, 94B15-HR is the more ductile: elongation 24% versus 17% for 94B15 QT-28-32HRC, and 94B15 QT-28-32HRC is harder (290 HB vs 156 HB). On the shop floor, 94B15-HR machines more easily (good vs fair) and 94B15-HR welds better (good vs fair).

94B15-HRChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

94B15 QT-28-32HRCChoose it when strength drives the design.

94B15-HR vs 94B15 QT-28-32HRC: properties

94B15-HR94B15 QT-28-32HRC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

545 MPa79 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
790 MPa115 ksi

Elongation at Break

24%
17%

Reduction in Area

54%
57%

Shear Strength

355 MPa51.5 ksi
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

105 MPa·√m95.6 ksi·√in
95 MPa·√m86.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

62 J45.7 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

156 HB
290 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
78 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,500°C2,732 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

44 W/m·K25.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 8 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V · Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
47 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

62%
50%

Weldability

58 / 100
38 / 100

Formability (cold)

62 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 65 / 100 · Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 1.9 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale94B15

94B15-HR vs 94B15 QT-28-32HRC — frequently asked

Is 94B15 QT-28-32HRC stronger than 94B15-HR?

Yes. 94B15 QT-28-32HRC has a typical yield strength of 790 MPa (115 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for 94B15-HR — about 119% more. Tensile strength is 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 545 MPa (79 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, HR or QT-28-32HRC?

ANN is the default 94B15 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither HR nor QT-28-32HRC). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 94B15-HR or 94B15 QT-28-32HRC?

94B15-HR. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (47/100) for 94B15 QT-28-32HRC; for welding the order is 94B15-HR first (good, 58/100) then 94B15 QT-28-32HRC (fair, 38/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 94B15-HR and 94B15 QT-28-32HRC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.