FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 8640 Annealed vs 8640 Q&T

Steel · 8640 temper comparison

8640 Annealed and 8640 Q&T are two conditions of the same steel grade, 8640: Annealed versus Q&T (quenched and tempered). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 8640 Q&T is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for 8640 Annealed, about 163% more; tensile strength follows at 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 695 MPa (101 ksi). In exchange, 8640 Annealed is the more ductile: elongation 22.5% versus 17% for 8640 Q&T, and 8640 Q&T is harder (331 HB vs 184 HB). 8640 Q&T runs hotter in service (450°C vs 400°C continuous). On the shop floor, 8640 Annealed machines more easily (good vs fair) and 8640 Annealed welds better (fair vs poor).

8640 AnnealedChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

8640 Q&TChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

8640 Annealed vs 8640 Q&T: properties

8640 Annealed8640 Q&T

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

695 MPa101 ksi
1,100 MPa160 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Elongation at Break

22.5%
17%

Reduction in Area

51%
54%

Compressive Strength

570 MPa82.7 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
660 MPa95.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in
85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
45 J33.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

184 HB
331 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

20 HRC
35 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

193 HV
348 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,500°C2,732 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
450°C842 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 475 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 7.8 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.65 V · Corrosion Resistance 14 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
42 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
45%

Weldability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 1.9 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale8640

8640 Annealed vs 8640 Q&T — frequently asked

Is 8640 Q&T stronger than 8640 Annealed?

Yes. 8640 Q&T has a typical yield strength of 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for 8640 Annealed — about 163% more. Tensile strength is 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 695 MPa (101 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, Annealed or Q&T?

HR is the default 8640 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither Annealed nor Q&T). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 8640 Annealed or 8640 Q&T?

8640 Annealed. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (42/100) for 8640 Q&T; for welding the order is 8640 Annealed first (fair, 45/100) then 8640 Q&T (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 8640 Annealed and 8640 Q&T side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.