FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 81B45-CD vs 81B45 QT28-32

Steel · 81B45 temper comparison

81B45-CD and 81B45 QT28-32 are two conditions of the same steel grade, 81B45: CD (cold drawn) versus QT28-32 (Q&T 28–32 HRC). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 81B45 QT28-32 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 860 MPa (125 ksi) against 635 MPa (92.1 ksi) for 81B45-CD, about 35% more; tensile strength follows at 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 745 MPa (108 ksi). 81B45 QT28-32 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 12% for 81B45-CD, and 81B45 QT28-32 is harder (293 HB vs 217 HB). 81B45 QT28-32 runs hotter in service (480°C vs 400°C continuous). On the shop floor, 81B45-CD machines more easily (good vs fair).

81B45-CDChoose it when the part is machined in volume.

81B45 QT28-32Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

81B45-CD vs 81B45 QT28-32: properties

81B45-CD81B45 QT28-32

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

745 MPa108 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

635 MPa92.1 ksi
860 MPa125 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
18%

Reduction in Area

40%
55%

Shear Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in
95 MPa·√m86.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

22 J16.2 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

217 HB
293 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

96 HRB
90 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

228 HV
302 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Compressive Strength 400 MPa58 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,416°C2,581 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,470°C2,678 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
480°C896 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 7.8 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.61 V · Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
46 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

70%
50%

Weldability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.1 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale81B45

81B45-CD vs 81B45 QT28-32 — frequently asked

Is 81B45 QT28-32 stronger than 81B45-CD?

Yes. 81B45 QT28-32 has a typical yield strength of 860 MPa (125 ksi) against 635 MPa (92.1 ksi) for 81B45-CD — about 35% more. Tensile strength is 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 745 MPa (108 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, CD or QT28-32?

A is the default 81B45 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither CD nor QT28-32). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 81B45-CD or 81B45 QT28-32?

81B45-CD. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (46/100) for 81B45 QT28-32; for welding the order is 81B45 QT28-32 first (fair, 45/100) then 81B45-CD (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 81B45-CD and 81B45 QT28-32 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.