FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 18Ni(400) Aged vs 18Ni(400)-CD

Steel · 18Ni(400) temper comparison

18Ni(400) Aged and 18Ni(400)-CD are two conditions of the same steel grade, 18Ni(400): Aged (solution annealed + aged 480 °C, 3–6 h, air cool) versus CD (cold drawn). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 18Ni(400) Aged is the stronger of the two: yield strength 2,680 MPa (389 ksi) against 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) for 18Ni(400)-CD, about 114% more; tensile strength follows at 2,760 MPa (400 ksi) vs 1,400 MPa (203 ksi). 18Ni(400) Aged is harder — 58 HRC against 40 HRC for 18Ni(400)-CD — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 18Ni(400) Aged is stiffer (200 GPa vs 190 GPa) and 18Ni(400) Aged runs hotter in service (400°C vs 250°C continuous). On the shop floor, 18Ni(400)-CD machines more easily (32 vs 18 out of 100) and 18Ni(400)-CD forms better (poor vs not recommended).

18Ni(400) AgedChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

18Ni(400)-CDChoose it when the part is machined in volume.

18Ni(400) Aged vs 18Ni(400)-CD: properties

18Ni(400) Aged18Ni(400)-CD

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
190 GPa27.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

2,760 MPa400 ksi
1,400 MPa203 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

2,680 MPa389 ksi
1,250 MPa181 ksi

Reduction in Area

28%
45%

Compressive Strength

2,800 MPa406 ksi
1,300 MPa189 ksi

Shear Strength

1,650 MPa239 ksi
850 MPa123 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

800 MPa116 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

8 J5.9 ft·lbf
35 J25.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

58 HRC
40 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

655 HV
392 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 165 GPa23.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Elongation at Break 6%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 8.1 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,400°C2,552 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,440°C2,624 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

18 W/m·K10.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
19.5 W/m·K11.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 10.1 µm/m·K5.6 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -73°C-99 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.6 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m26 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.55 V · Corrosion Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
32 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
32%

Weldability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 35 / 100 · Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 6.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 20%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale18Ni(400)

18Ni(400) Aged vs 18Ni(400)-CD — frequently asked

Is 18Ni(400) Aged stronger than 18Ni(400)-CD?

Yes. 18Ni(400) Aged has a typical yield strength of 2,680 MPa (389 ksi) against 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) for 18Ni(400)-CD — about 114% more. Tensile strength is 2,760 MPa (400 ksi) vs 1,400 MPa (203 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, Aged or CD?

Aged is the default 18Ni(400) condition in the FabDigit quote flow. The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 18Ni(400) Aged or 18Ni(400)-CD?

18Ni(400)-CD, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 32/100 against 18/100 for 18Ni(400) Aged; for welding the order is 18Ni(400)-CD first (very good, 75/100) then 18Ni(400) Aged (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 18Ni(400) Aged and 18Ni(400)-CD side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.