FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1.2842-QT250 vs 1.2842-SR

Steel · 1.2842 temper comparison

1.2842-QT250 and 1.2842-SR are two conditions of the same steel grade, 1.2842: QT250 (Q&T 250 °C) versus SR (stress relieved). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 1.2842-QT250 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,780 MPa (258 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for 1.2842-SR, about 4.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 2,050 MPa (297 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). In exchange, 1.2842-SR is the more ductile: elongation 16% versus 2% for 1.2842-QT250, and 1.2842-QT250 is harder (58 HRC vs 17 HRC). 1.2842-SR runs hotter in service (400°C vs 210°C continuous). On the shop floor, 1.2842-SR machines more easily (fair vs not recommended) and 1.2842-SR welds better (poor vs not recommended).

1.2842-QT250Choose it when strength drives the design.

1.2842-SRChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

1.2842-QT250 vs 1.2842-SR: properties

1.2842-QT2501.2842-SR

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

208 GPa30.2 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

2,050 MPa297 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,780 MPa258 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
16%

Reduction in Area

4%
35%

Compressive Strength

2,450 MPa355 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Shear Strength

1,240 MPa180 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

630 MPa91.4 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

12 J8.9 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

58 HRC
17 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

655 HV
225 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 81 GPa11.7 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Hardness, Brinell 215 HB · Hardness, Rockwell B 95 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,470°C2,678 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

31 W/m·K17.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
33 W/m·K19.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

210°C410 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12.5 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -30°C-22 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

6.5 % IACS
7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11 µΩ·in
2.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.84 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

12 / 100
10 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

10 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

10%
45%

Weldability

5 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

3 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Castability 20 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100 · Polishability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.4 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 65 L/kg7.8 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.2842

1.2842-QT250 vs 1.2842-SR — frequently asked

Is 1.2842-QT250 stronger than 1.2842-SR?

Yes. 1.2842-QT250 has a typical yield strength of 1,780 MPa (258 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for 1.2842-SR — about 4.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 2,050 MPa (297 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, QT250 or SR?

Annealed is the default 1.2842 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither QT250 nor SR). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 1.2842-QT250 or 1.2842-SR?

1.2842-SR. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against not recommended (10/100) for 1.2842-QT250; for welding the order is 1.2842-SR first (poor, 20/100) then 1.2842-QT250 (not recommended, 5/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.2842-QT250 and 1.2842-SR side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.